Liberal Candy Crowley Loses Control of Interview That Turns Into Wasserman-Schultz Blabberfest

Candy Crowley Loses Control of Interview That Turns Into Wasserman-Schultz Blabberfest
Candy Crowley could have redirected the robotic disgorger of Democrat talking points, DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, back to the question she had asked. Instead, she chooses to give her as much leash as she wants.
Crowley asks what should have been an easy question to answer, if Wasserman-Schultz weren’t doing her best to avoid doing so. She simply asked whether or not the upcoming midterm elections are about “president” Obama’s policies.
Once she starts talking it is always a difficult task to control Wasserman-Schultz, but Crowley is supposed to be up to the challenge. That is a critical part of her role as a moderator. Maybe a stint as an intern in a local DC animal control facility would help her hone her interview skills, especially when it comes to evasive Democrats and particularly this evasive Democrat.
Wasserman-Schultz rambles on covering a wide range of talking points totally unrelated to the question asked. When it becomes more than he can tolerate, and clearly evident that Crowley has either lost control or is complicit in last-minute Democrat salvage efforts, Reince Preibus attempts to do Crowley’s job for her. He tries to force Wasserman-Schultz back to the question but he can’t do it on his own.
Crowley lets her continue as long as she can get away with, still without answering the question, until Wasserman-Schultz mentions the right trigger word of “extremism,” which conveniently leads into Crowley’s next point. It almost is too convenient, and looks like it could have been planned that way.
Crowley plays an attack ad against Colorado Senate Candidate Corey Gardner “as an example of campaign tactics,” in which he is labeled an extremist and then lets Wasserman-Schultz move onto a new tirade against Gardner.
It’s more than a little suspicious and we all remember her debate “correction” of Mitt Romney. A free national campaign spot against a Republican challenger is a nice gift and taken in combination with the rest of the interview, her motivations are pretty obvious.
You could see Preibus looking to Crowley on several occasions as if to ask her if she’s going to do her job or just allow this nonsense to continue and he must have been tempted to throw his hands up in the air or to just shout over the noise coming from his counterpart.
He finally can’t take it anymore and just backs off from attempting to have a reasonable discussion, saying, “This is ridiculous.” He’s right; what’s more ridiculous is that a partisan organization like CNN portrays itself as unbiased while exhibiting obvious partisanship such as this.

Wild Thing’s comment…….
Both of these women are horrible.