Rick Perry at the New Hampshire House of Representatives ~ This is an amazing speech!!!!
Congress should be a part-time job
By Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal
The Hill
12/01/10
As the incoming freshman Congressional class readies itself to lead and improve our country, they should remember the “do-nothing” Congress of Harry Truman’s era. Based on the first two years of the Obama administration, I’m all in favor of a do-nothing Congress. If Truman were alive today, I expect he’d long for the “good old days” when Congress had a measure of self-restraint.
Americans don’t have a high opinion of Congress right now. Polls show that only 21 percent of Americans believe Congress is doing a good job. When it comes to ethics and morality, studies show Americans rank congressmen barely above car salesmen—an unfair comparison, at least most states have lemon laws to protect you from dishonest car salesmen.
Believing they’re unpopular because Americans “just don’t understand” the great job they’re doing, congressmen send out more letters, fight for more pork and earmarks, and make more TV appearances. But the American people dislike congressmen precisely because they know what they’re doing—they’re spending our country into oblivion. Congress has lost touch with the people they are supposed to serve.
Our country is in terrible financial shape, as we compile a massive debt for our children and grandchildren to pay. Right now, each American “owes” $45,000 on the national debt, and that figure is set to rise much higher. What we need to do is institute a series of radical changes that I would call the “Saving Our Grandchildren’s Inheritance” package.
We start by remaking Congress and there are several vital steps American needs to take.
The first: make being a congressman a part-time job. We used to pay farmers not to grow crops so maybe we should pay members of congress not to pass laws. It would fundamentally change Washington, forcing congressmen to spend much more time back in their districts interacting with regular people. It would also encourage greater independence by young members of Congress. Most crucially, under a part-time Congress, congressmen would no longer regard politics as their career.
Plenty of solid research shows Congress feels the need to do something when it’s in session. Looking at Congress over a 25-year period, Professors Mwangi Kimenyi and Robert D. Tollison discovered the more time Congress spends in session, the longer and more complex laws become, and the more money Congress spends.
We also need a series of what I would call Fiscal Sanity Initiatives. For example:
• We need a federal balanced budget amendment. Most states already have to abide by these limits, and Washington should do the same.
• We should adopt a constitutional amendment to require a supermajority in Congress to raise taxes, along with a pay-as-you-go rule to help enforce a balanced budget amendment.
• A supermajority should also be required for government spending that exceeds historical norms as a percentage of GDP.
Serving in Congress used to be just that—an act of service, not a financially lucrative training ground for lobbyists. Our Founding Fathers envisioned that being a member of Congress would be a part-time job. Pennsylvania’s state constitution even had a provision calling for members of the Legislature to “have some profession, calling, trade, or farm, whereby he may honestly subsist.” Otherwise, they feared legislators would come to rely on politics as a career, and they would be unable to “preserve [their] independence.” Back then, farmers would literally leave their fields and go to legislate in our nation’s capital.
For almost two hundred years, being in Congress meant holding down another job. As recently as the 1950s, Congress was still largely a part-time institution. Aside from extraordinary times such as World War II, members arrived in Washington by train in January and left in the summer. Granted, a part-time Congress would face its own ethical issues. How can we avoid conflicts of interest when people simultaneously run a business and pass laws? How could we prevent businesses from hiring congressmen just for the sake of influence? The answer is simple: full disclosure. Let the voters know everything, and they can render their judgment at election time.
.
Wild Thing’s comment………
I LOVE Perry’s speech! WOW!!!
And this is great that Gov. Bobby Jindal not only supports Perry but also agree so much with what he wants to do and has written this item above.
Something to share with you…..
Rick Perry’s ‘Fed Up’: Book Proceeds Go To Conservative Group Echoing Controversial Policy Ideas
Perry lives and breathes the 10th amendment in at least 4 ways
1. In his governing
2. In his writing
3. In his speeches
4. With proceeds from his book ” Fed UP” – 100% to the Center for the Tenth Amendment. He received high praise from Huckabee, and the 3 state attorney’s general on his fidelity to and understanding of the 10th amendment in the Saturday “debate” forum hosted by Huckabee.
Perry/Jindal in 2012.
All of the original Bill of Rights are important to me. But, I do tend more to the Second and Tenth Amendments because they are the ones the career politicians and socialist Progressives(liberals) attack the most often.
Gov. Perry believes as I do in the sanctity of The Constitution and these two amendments in particular. Gov. Perry is a firearms owner and supporter. As governor of Texas he has had to fight the overreaching arms of the federal govt. as it violates the Tenth Amendment. The other candidates, except Ron Paul, seldom mention these two constitutional amendments. That is one of many reasons I support Gov. Perry.
The others, again excepting Libertarian Ron Paul, also say nothing about reducing the overbloated Congress and it’s unconstitutional overreach. Texas, like New Hampshire, has a part time state legislature. I would love to see the US Congress become part time and term limited.