Appeals Briefs Scheduled in Obama Eligibility Challenge

There were no objections called for by VP Cheney, and no audible objections were sounded from any member of Congress before the Electoral Vote count was called.
Watch the video very carefully beginning around 3:45.
VP Cheney keeps glancing up and to his left. Suddenly, for no apparent reason, Nazi Pelousy jumps up and starts clapping with a huge grin like some circus clown.
If you listen there seems to be a couple of voices raised but are immediately drowned out by loud cheers.
At 4:07 as the camera pans the room in the far lower left you can see a tall bearded man with his hand UP…not clapping. That would be my Congressman, Steven LaTourette. Standing next to him is little Dennis Kucinich.
It is entirely possible that LaTourette was indeed trying to object. He is a bit of a RINO, but better than most from this state.
~ Wild Thiing

.

.

‘We look forward to moving ahead with this very important constitutional case’
wnd
A briefing schedule has been announced by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case alleging Congress failed in its constitutional duties by refusing to investigate the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president, according to an attorney handling the challenge.
Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the action in January on behalf of Kerchner, Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The case focuses on the alleged failure of Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, “provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate ‘elected’ by the Electoral College Electors.”
The case asserts “when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same.”
The Constitution also provides, the lawsuit says, “If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified.”
“There existed significant public doubt and grievances from plaintiffs and other concerned Americans regarding Obama’s eligibility to be president and defendants had the sworn duty to protect and preserve the Constitution and specifically under the 20th Amendment, Section 3, a Constitutional obligation to confirm whether Obama, once the electors elected him, was qualified,” the case explained.
Now the attorney has posted an online statement that the brief on behalf of the appellants is due Jan. 4, 2010.

In an e-mail announcing the schedule, Kerchner wrote, “We look forward to moving ahead with this very important constitutional case along the legal pathway to the ultimate decision maker for this historic and precedence setting lawsuit, the U.S. Supreme Court.”

He continued. “They will determine the answer to the pressing legal question of what is a ‘natural born citizen’ of the USA per Article II constitutional standards and did Obama and the U.S. Congress violate the Constitution and statutory laws and my constitutional rights during the 2008 election cycle.”

“I say Obama does not meet the founders and framers intent for the Article II eligibility clause. I say Obama is a deceiver and a usurper,” he wrote today.

We allege that Obama has not conclusively proven that he was born in Hawaii. More importantly, we also allege that he is not an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ because when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same,” he wrote.

The lawyer said it is important that the court did not rule Obama was born in Hawaii, nor did it rule that the claim was frivolous.
It simply said the case was dismissed because of a jurisdiction issue.

“By the court finding that plaintiffs do not have standing and that their claims present a political question, the court was able to avoid having to address the underlying merits of the Kerchner case. With such a decision, the American people unfortunately still do not know where Obama was born and whether he is an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ and therefore constitutionally eligible to be president and commander in chief,” the attorney said.

“A court cannot refuse to hear a case on the merits merely because it prefers not to due to grave social or political ramifications,” he continued. “The court’s opinion dismissing the Kerchner complaint/petition did not address the real Kerchner case but rather looked for a way to dismiss the case without having to reach the merits of the question of whether Obama is an Article II ‘natural born citizen.’

“The American people deserve to know whether Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. More importantly, even if he is born in Hawaii, given that he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship, the American people deserve to know whether he is an Article II ‘natural born citizen’ which would make him eligible to be president,” the attorney said.

Wild Thing’s comment……….
It is good to see that this case is moving forward, I am set on staying positive about this but it is hard when so many have turned down the lawsuits, grrrr. I do believe that this approach might work, but the anointed one is a slippery cuss.
Let’s pray that America’s best days are ahead of us. I’m glad that one case has the chance to be heard on this Interloper acting as our President.
The case focuses on the alleged failure of Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, “provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate ‘elected’ by the Electoral College Electors.”
Pelosi and the Democrats colluded to circumvent the US Constitution.

….Thank you Mark for sending this to me.
Mark
3rd Mar.Div. 1st Battalion 9th Marine Regiment
1/9 Marines aka The Walking Dead
VN 66-67