30 Aug

Cindy McCain tells Stephanopoulos that Obama Offended Her




Barack Obama’s younger brother George in a slum hut in Nairobi

Cindy McCain tells Stephanopoulos that Obama Offended Her
ABC news
ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos reports: Democrats’ attacks on her family’s wealth are unfair and offensive, Cindy McCain said today in an interview airing tomorrow on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.”
For nearly two weeks, Democrats have repeatedly hit Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., for saying he is unaware of how many houses he owns, calling the presumptive Republican presidential nominee out of touch with everyday Americans. In his acceptance speech at the Democratic convention on Thursday, Democratic nominee Barack Obama turned up the heat on McCain, saying he “doesn’t know” about the lives of middle-class Americans.

“I’m offended by Barack Obama saying that about my husband,” said McCain’s wife Cindy.
When asked if Obama went too far in his criticism of McCain, Cindy responded, “I do. I do. I really do.”

McCain also said beer the distributorship her father built, which is the source of much her family’s wealth, typifies the American Dream.

“My father had nothing. He and my mother sold everything they had to raise $10,000,” she said. “I’m proud of what my dad and my mother did and what they built and left me. And I intend to carry their legacy as long as I can.”

More of the exclusive interview with Cindy McCain airs tomorrow on “This Week.”
UPDATE: The Obama campaign is not backing down. “The fact that John McCain does not know how many houses he owns when millions are struggling to stay in the only house they have shows he’s out of touch with the lives of real Americans,” said Obama spokeswoman Linda Douglass Saturday afternoon. “McCain is promising to double down on the economic policies of George W. Bush which have benefited corporations and CEO’s while leaving middle-class families behind. John McCain just doesn’t get it.”
Douglass later added that “the issue here isn’t the wealth of the McCain family, it’s that Senator McCain is out of touch when he says that the fundamentals of our economy are strong’ and that the Bush economy has ‘made great progress’ when most Americans are actually losing ground.”

.


Wild Thing’s comment………..
This will air tomorrow on “This Week”.
Good for Cindy!!!! B. Hussein and Michelle Obama are jealous !
They hit with houses. You hit back with Rezko and Ayers.
The fact that her father and mother built the business means nothing to a socialist that thinks in black and white. (no pun intended but what the hey haha) And Obama allows his own brother to live in a ” hut” on $1 a month.
Let’s see there is Barack Obama’s older brother Malik Abongo “Roy” Obama, who is a Luo activist and a militant Muslim.
Then there is Barack’s Muslim brother Bernard the son of Kezia Obama who married Barack Obama Sr. in Kenya in 1957 when she was a teenager (16) before he went to the US where he fathered Barack. Bernard was born after Barack Sr. came back to Africa.
The British media was able to track down Barack’s brother Mark Ndesandjo the son of Barack Obama’s late father and his third wife, an American woman named Ruth Nidesand. Mark ran an illegal firm in China.
And the Italian press discovered Barack Obama’s younger brother George in a slum hut in Nairobi. He is the son of Barack Obama Sr. and Jael. ( source and article)
Obama offends ANYONE who is a red-blooded, American who understand what oppressive socialism and Marxism are, and stand for. Hussein Obama offends America and Americans. His anti-American entourage is replete with hate America and blame America first marxist socialists
Maybe Cindy should have said:

“John knows exactly how many houses we own. He was just reluctant to say because he was concerned that Obama would send William Ayers over to blow them up!!”

….Thank you Mark for sending this.

BobF says:

Actually, wouldn’t the houses belong to Cindy? Who cares if he doesn’t know how many houses his wife owns?
Many men and women who are on their second marriages keep a lot of their personal finances to themselves. They don’t share with their “new” spouse everything pertaining to financial matters. It’s usually only during the first marriage that everything is shared.

Les says:

Barak Hussein Obama and his campaign are desperate and will say and do anything to get elected. I hope that Cindy McCain does bring up George Hussein Obama during the interview being aired tomorrow. If not, Stephanopoulos should. Fair is fair. Obama talked about being his brothers keeper. In his case, that meens keeping him in poverty and squaller.

Wild Thing says:

BobF, yes they are used by the McCain’s but they are an investment too. And set up in trusts for their children.

Wild Thing says:

Les, yes it is really stupid on the part of Obama do use the houses thing as an item for attack. It got old very fast and now it just seems he has nothing else he can bring up or he is just out and out jealous. He is such a jerk.

Trish says:

Ooh, look out, it’s the big bad rich white guy! Bleah.
Obviously Obama realized he’s better not go after Palin, so he’s harping on the old “Republicans only care about the rich” theme. At least now we have a candidate who knows how to fight back.

Mark says:

Linda Douglas claiming all these people are barely clinging to the one house they have. They never ask why, like maybe the house they bought was too expensive in the first place and they really couldn’t afford it.
Since when is the American dream an entitlement and since when does the government have the responsibility to bail out a delinquent mortgage, due solely to the homeowners own fault.
But Socialist Obama expects everybody else to pay for their neighbors delinquent mortgage. Again its class envy, Saul Alinsky, in perfect form divide and conquer the haves by taking away what they rightfully earned.

Trish says:

And oh, yeah–
maybe not knowing how many houses you have is a bit less reprehensible than not knowing how many brothers you have.

Trish says:

Oh, Mark, incidentally, I am clinging to the one house I have, but I did not buy it. I inherited it. It’s a piece of garbage, but I can’t sell it because it was built in the 1920s, and there is no possible way I can bring it up to code. I’m going broke trying to keep it in minimally habitable condition. Just to let you know it isn’t always greed.

TomR says:

Now we have the primaries out of the way and the nominees can turn on each other. I think we are going to see some dirty fighting. Obama has far more dirty linen than McCain, so Obama needs to be careful what he says. His socialist/Marxist desires will slip out as he attacks McCain and Palin. It will become very evident that Obama is a typical limousine liberal. Living the good life himself, but pretending to represent the have nots by attacking the success or luck of others who acquire wealth. Typical Kerry/Kennedy/Pelosi style Democrat.

Mark says:

Well Trish, not to be trite but I have renovated many houses, I was an electrical contractor for many years, and houses can be brought up to code, especially older ones which incredibly are easier than the newer ones. Basically because of the way they were built.
If you can’t sell it turn it into a rental property, Yes there are investments involved and of course there are risks involved but anything worthwhile is worth going after with a plan.
You can get extensions for the city to bring it up to code, usually in most cities, a 100 amp service is a starting point and getting rid of exposed Knob and tube wiring. K and T still in the walls is code compliant as long as it has not been exposed. K and T is still listed in the 2008 NEC, so old wiring depends on its location.
In Ohio where I was licensed, the city of warren had codes and you had to comply with state and Federal codes but they were workable.
So you can have a plan or be stuck with your white elephant but there are ways to get around this.
I have worked on too many old houses for there NOT to be an option. Worst case if you have the deed sell the property and raze the house. First thing to do is to check building codes in your area.
But I was talking about people making 8 dollars an hour and buying a house so far out of their reach they should not have been considered for the mortgage in the first place. Then they expect their neighbors to pay the defualt. And that is exactly what is happening.

Trish says:

Mark–
if I can’t afford to bring the house up to code, I obviously can’t get a CO to turn it into a rental property. Plus there would be the tiny little question of where I would live.
Yes, many older houses can be brought up to code. I invite you to come over to my place and show me how that can be done. I’ll bet you a silver dollar to a used washer that you can’t do it. And I am absolutely certain that you can’t do it without pouring thousands of dollars into the place. I don’t have thousands of dollars.
I wish you could provide options for me, Mark, but you haven’t.

Trish says:

Mark–
I rather suspect that if I can’t sell the property because it is not up to code, I will not be able to get a certificate of occupancy stating that it is up to code. I have no intention of renting out an illegal property.
There is also the tiny little matter of where I am going to live. Having to pour all my money into this white elephant means that I have no money to live anywhere else. If you believe that my house can be brought up to code without spending thousands of dollars I don’t have, you are welcome to come over here and show me how.
The wiring in this house is not 1960s wiring. It is 1920s wiring. There isn’t a grounded outlet anywhere in the house. If you can remedy 1920s wiring for a price a working family can afford, please come and show me how.
Sure, I could raze it, and get nothing for it. I would also still have that tiny little matter hanging over me. I would love to be able to get rid of my white elephant, but you haven’t yet shown me any way I can do that.