« Immigration Law Protesters Interrupt Mets Game | Main | Obama Stops National Guard From Going To Arizona and Other Updates »
August 01, 2010
Explosive New Evidence Shows Ruling of AZ Judge Illegal
SB1070 Protesters With Mexican and Che Guevara Flags Outside Maricopa Jail
http://www.StandwithArizona.com
Astroturf union thugs and illegals bussed into Phoenix try and rush the Maricopa Jail, while screaming obsenities, waving Mexican flags and a Cuban flag overlayed with 'revolutionary' murderer Che Guevara.
Arizona Sheriff Not Relenting after Court Ruling
"It's my job," said Arpaio, standing beside a sheriff's truck that has a number for an immigration hot line written on its side. "I have two state (immigration) laws that I am enforcing. It's not federal, it's state."
.
Ariz. governor considers changing immigration law
Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the law and appealed a ruling blocking its most controversial sections, said Friday she would consider changes to "tweak" the law to respond to the parts U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton faulted.
"Basically we believe (the law) is constitutional but she obviously pointed out faults that can possibly be fixed, and that's what we would do," Brewer told The Associated Press. She said she's talking to legislative leaders about the possibility of a special session, but said no specific changes had been identified.
Explosive new evidence shows ruling of AZ judge illegal
In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.
The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part,
"Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.
"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:
"In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."
In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state.
This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.
Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case.
The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be accessed at the link above.
In a related development, another explosive discovery was made by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America.
From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican border.
This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.
The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government, including waging war in its self-defense.
This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the federal government with a vengeance.
Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.
Wild Thing's comment.......
When those protesters started massing right in front of the Maricopa jail, Sheriff Joe sent out a press release thanking the protesters for helping his deputies "save on gas"! (23 people were arrested in front of the jail and put in pink underwear). God bless 'America's Sheriff'. In total, 71 people were arrested during the Thursday protests, officials said Friday.
Regarding the ruling being against the Constitution. It amazes me how many Judges and lawyers that should know the ins and outs of our Constitution turn it into something twisted so they can push their agenda.
And Gov. Brewer....... Noooooooo!!! Don't change it enforce it!! If they “tweak” to the “judges” contentment, they are letting the “judge” write the law. Maybe, just maybe she is using the Dem tactic that we saw with the Health Care disaster. The law is already passed, change it slightly to use different wording and enforce it anyway because it passed.
....Thank you Mark for sending this to me.
Mark
3rd Mar.Div. 1st Battalion 9th Marine Regiment
1/9 Marines aka The Walking Dead
VN 66-67
Posted by Wild Thing at August 1, 2010 05:50 AM
Comments
Ok, everybody and me included read the Bill of Rights and I confess I don't know enough about it. I remember in school when a kid we were not taught anything about the Constitution and what it meant. Bill of Rights yes but not what is in the Constitution.
If this is true that Susan Bolton had no jurisdiction over the case in Arizona, why don't her lawyers know this. Obviously her (Governor Brewer) lawyers haven't read that part of the constitution. If they don't know this they should get their money back because they wasted it at Law School.
On Fox News, Laura Ingraham doesn't know about this either, she interviewed some lawyer who apparently doesn't know about this either. So what the hell is going on here.
No lawyer in the country or at least the ones on our side never heard of Article 3, Section II, clause 2 of the Constitution.
I can't believe nobody has brought this up.
Posted by: Mark at August 1, 2010 08:21 AM
The news reporter says it was a "sizable crowd". It only looked to be about 150-200 people to me. For the rhetoric generated against the law, I wouldn't consider that sizable. It's too bad a few hundred law abiding citizens didn't come marching down the street and take care of things but they were probably all at work.
Posted by: BobF at August 1, 2010 09:09 AM
I love Sherrif Joe. He knows what his job is and does what most of us in his position would do. Refuse to back down. His comment about saving gasoline, is classic and typical of him.
Did the rest of you see the pictures of the adult male "Protester" crying after having been arrested the other day? I'll bet he had to have a couple of pairs of the pink underwear, once he got to the jail.
Does anyone believe, like I do that a lot of the protesters are the same ones who show up at the G20 conferences, Anti-war rallies, etc.. In other words they are mercenaries, in effect.
Posted by: Sean at August 1, 2010 12:20 PM
Mark, "I can't believe nobody has brought this up."..... I don't get it either, why so many lawyers like the one with Laura Ingraham and some others not knowing this. But the article breaks it down so I can understand it and it makes sense to me.
Good idea Mark too about reading it again.
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 2, 2010 12:10 AM
BobF., good point, I bet the law abiders were at work like you said.
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 2, 2010 12:14 AM
Sean, I agree, I loved what he said about gasoline. I agree too about those showing up lots
of similarities.
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 2, 2010 12:16 AM
