« Et tu, Netanyahu? by Caroline B. Glick | Main | Man with NO Honor or Principles Ted Kennedy Seeks To Change Election Rules »
August 22, 2009
Constitution Under Attack: Senate Panel OK’s Stripping States Of Constitutional Power
Constitution Under Attack: Senate Panel OK’s Stripping States Of Constitutional Power
Friday, August 21, 2009
An amendment to remove the constitutional right of governors to appoint individuals to U.S. Senate seats that become vacant in between elections was recently approved by a 5-to-3 vote in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.
The resolution, which favors direct elections rather than gubernatorial appointments to unoccupied Senate seats as the Constitution requires, was introduced Jan. 29, following news of a pay-to-play scheme involving then-Illinois Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who is accused of scheming to sell President Barack Obama's former U.S. Senate seat.
Before introducing the amendment, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, released a statement advocating an end to the constitutional right of Blagojevich-type appointments to Senate seats.
“The controversies surrounding some of the recent gubernatorial appointments to vacant Senate seats make it painfully clear that such appointments are an anachronism that must end,” said Feingold.
“In 1913, the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution gave the citizens of this country the power to finally elect their senators,” he said. “They should have the same power in the case of unexpected mid-term vacancies, so that the Senate is as responsive as possible to the will of the people.”In Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution, dealing with members of the Senate, it states:
“[I]f Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof [governor] may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies.”The 17th Amendment to the Constitution reads:
“When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.”
To be approved, the potential 28th constitutional amendment has to be supported by an overall congressional majority of two-thirds and also by three-quarters of the states. The 27th Amendment made it through in 1992, more than two centuries after it was submitted in 1789.
Feingold’s resolution to change the way open Senate seats can be filled garnered somewhat bi-partisan support, with backing from Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), as well as Mark Begich (D-Alaska).
By September, the Feingold proposal is supposed to reach full-committee consideration where it is expected to face opposition.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) recently told reporters that he is against the subcommittee’s proposition.
"I'm not in favor of our dictating to a state what it should do," said Reid. "We have a system now where some states have special elections and some have governors appoint.”
The Senate leader added: "In the state of Nevada the governor appoints. Even though we have a Republican governor now, I think that's the way it should be – so I don't support this legislation.”Both Reid and Durbin attempted to deny Burris his Senate seat. To be approved, the potential 28th constitutional amendment has to be supported by an overall congressional majority of two-thirds and also by three-quarters of the states. The 27th Amendment made it through in 1992, more than two centuries after it was submitted in 1789. Republicans on the Senate Constitution subcommittee who voted against the measure include John Kyl (R-Ariz.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas), who was appointed by Texas Gov. Rick Perry in November 2002.
The Senate’s Web site reveals that 184 senators have been elected through gubernatorial appointments since 1913.
The Feingold amendment, formally known as S.J.Res.7, states:
“Section 1. No person shall be a Senator from a State unless such person has been elected by the people thereof. When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies.
“Section 2. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as a part of the Constitution.”
Wild Thing's comment....
I think this has a lot to do with Ted Kennedy too.
This is what we have in power, people that have no respect at all for our Constitution. Only a few, only a handful and thank God for the few we do have.
Posted by Wild Thing at August 22, 2009 05:47 AM
Comments
NO! This is simply appalling to think that the federal government can just strip states of their Constitutional rights. That just goes to show that our so-called democrat run government is really socialist. Socialists love to take rights away. And I'm still gettin' all pissy!
Posted by: Lynn at August 22, 2009 07:01 AM
Feingold - enemy of the state but proponent of The State.
No surprise with McCain or Durbin either - peas in a pod. Beware Statist pod people!!!
Posted by: yankeemom at August 22, 2009 09:12 AM
I guess the CSA was RIGHT after all in 1861 - STATES RIGHTS!
Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at August 22, 2009 12:07 PM
The Federal government now is so full of socialist crap that it is oozing out of all the government's many pores. I think many Americans are beginning to realize that the men who wrote The Constitution were far better men than the ones we have now trying to usurp The Constitution.
Amen darth. It may be time for the spirit of the South to rise again.
Posted by: TomR at August 22, 2009 12:42 PM
All they can do is propose an Amendment as it says in the last paragraph,
"To be approved, the potential 28th constitutional amendment has to be supported by an overall congressional majority of two-thirds and also by three-quarters of the states."
This will have to go out to the States and be apporved by 75 % of the 52 States. So screw them this is not a slam dunk by any stretch.
We need someone to propose the repeal of the 17th amendment and get the Constitution back to where it was protecting the people.
Posted by: Mark at August 22, 2009 04:20 PM
Lynn, they sure do. I hope they fight this,
if they can.
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 22, 2009 08:06 PM
Darth, we are seeing history being made
I sure hope it ends with America the
winner.
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 22, 2009 08:09 PM
Tom, I think so too, all the people
at the rallies, taking up what our
Founding Fathers wanted and stood for.
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 22, 2009 08:11 PM
Mark, whew, thank you for explaining that.
And for this too.
"So screw them this is not a slam dunk
by any stretch."
Posted by: Wild Thing at August 22, 2009 08:14 PM
