« Finale Republican Presidential Debate Before Super Tuesday ~ Tonight | Main | Madeleine Albright At Hillary's SF Campaign Headquarters »
January 30, 2008
Sometimes Deciding Is not Easy
This is my take on McCain and Romney and why Romney is the one I will vote for in November.
Sen. John McCain
There is no way I can vote for McCain, my first issue with him is what he did blocking the release of classified POW/MIA documents from the Vietnam War. I want him to burn in hell for what he did. Men left behind and he could have done something about it. He is vile and horrible.
To read about McCain and Senate Select Committee on POW and MIA
Go Here:
http://www.theodoresworld.net/archives/2008/01/mccain_and_senate_select_commi.html
My other huge issue about McCain is his in our face demand about his Amnesty for illegal's. I can feel his lies about building the fence, he is just saying that to try and appease we conservatives and even the few dems that are against it as well. He wants the illegal’s here and won't even be honest enough to use the word Amnesty just like Romney has pointed out several times how McCain is not being honest about this.
Add in to these above things all the other things McCain has done and NOT done. And the 'my friend' term every time he feels he might be stepping on toes or to do what calm his own temper down or something? hmmmm odd and I get sick of hearing it.
Mitt Romney
Former Independent then changed to Republican. Had the guts to run for office in the liberal State of Massachusetts. He has also been coming around to conservative views, slowly yes but at least there is hope there unlike the others. Much like Reagan did when he switched from a Democrat to a Republican. They can see the light sometimes and there is a ray of hope that Romney has and will continue to.
There are more positives about him then the others. And I am trying to be realistic too about him.
We all know how we loved Reagan and he did Amnesty which ticked me off, but then he said he made a mistake doing it. I admire Reagan for admitting his mistake, something Bush will never do nor McCain either.
When Romney has talked about change and vision, he's actually been specific in what he wants to do. Unlike others that just use the word change like lingo letting the audience put in their own desires of what is meant by their saying "change".
I realize wanting the perfect conservative “candidate" is just not possible. I guess there are a lot of reasons, and most of them come down to a much weakened RNC and GOP. A party that has caved in to PC and rino's over the years, backing rino's instead of conservatives when they run for the same office against a Democrat. It happened here in Florida with a few of the candidates when we got stuck with rino Crist, Mel Martinez ( a total jerk) and others. And Crist is not a popular Governor, so his support in Florida for McCain is not that big a deal to conservatives. But it worked for the half hearted ones I suppose to throw their vote to McCain. Lord knows!
I read this as well that was interesting......
Re: The Federalist Society:“...the Federalist Society, the expanding network of conservative lawyers who over the past quarter-century have played a leading role in reshaping the nation’s judiciary and setting high-level Republican administration policy."
But as the Federalists have grown, they haven’t been immune to internal fissures. Federalists have key figures in both the Romney and Thompson campaigns who believe their candidate is a more worthy vessel for their legal philosophies. And they say they haven’t had to make the sort of compromise that Giuliani’s conservative supporters have.
David McIntosh, a former Indiana GOP congressman and gubernatorial candidate, is vice chairman of the Federalist Society, and he’s a domestic policy adviser to Thompson. Douglas Kmiec, another high-ranking official in the Reagan Justice Department, has gone with Romney, whom he calls “authentic.”
Back in 1980 conservatives thought Reagan was a disastrous choice to face incumbent Jimmy Carter in November. After all, Reagan used to be a Democrat, one of those "Hollywood liberals" in fact, who not only admired Franklin Roosevelt but supported the New Deal and all the other big-government programs that FDR put into place. He would have been called a rino for sure if he was running today.
Then we have the divorce with Reagan's first wife. Many conservatives at the time called Reagan's morality into question. Now divorce in 2008 might not be such a big deal but in 1980, it was still something to be ashamed about, especially if you were running for President of the United States. In fact, even to this day, Ronald Reagan is the only U.S. president to ever have been divorced.
Now that was the atmosphere in which Ronald Reagan sought the GOP nomination back in 1980. When it looked like Reagan was the front-runner, the Republican establishment was in a panic. Many of them got behind a certain George H.W. Bush and in the Iowa caucus, Reagan got, well, bushwhacked.
Republicans urged Ronald Reagan to drop out after the Iowa loss but Reagan pulled himself off the mat and started racking up victory after victory.
But the GOP was still worried they were nominating the wrong man to go up against Carter. One of the GOP candidates (John Anderson) was so convinced that Reagan couldn't beat Carter that he decided to run an insurgent Independent campaign of his own. And suddenly he was polling 25% and Reagan was in danger of having his base eroded.
Reagan achieved wealth and success outside of politics.
Reagan earned his political stripes by getting elected governor of a large state that normally goes Democratic. A very liberal State.
Reagan was hated by other politicians. Reagan was his own man. He didn't owe anybody anything. Reagan, didn’t even need politics.
You could go back to January of 1980, and say try telling the conservative base that this Ronald Reagan is about to become the greatest president of our time. You might have gotten a few people to agree with you but the rest of them would have laughed at you and mocked you for your naivety and your stupid worship of this cardboard cutout of a presidential candidate from right out of central casting in Hollywood.
I'm not saying Romney will be another Reagan, but these would be the similarities I see as to how Reagan was treated and how Romney as well has been treated by the media and the others still in the running in the Republican party. Also as to how Reagan was a registered Democrat before switching to Republican and Romney was an Independent before becoming a Republican.
This has taken a lot of thought and discussions with Nick too. He felt this way for awhile and I think he is right. He is the one that mentioned about being in another party before becoming a Republican.
I am not gung ho, it is more like proceed with caution kind of feeling. One day at a time and we will see what happens.
What I do know is that our party is the best, it is injured now, weakened and the conservative base, (you and I) have been slapped in the face by the very President we voted for, campaigned for, worked to get elected. That being George Bush. He did this with his Amnesty bill, and twice he did this to us. He tried with his thinking of nominating Harriet Miers and we let him know it was a no go for us. His behavior with the Saudi's etc. has been disgusting to the max as well. And his being a weak friend to Israel well there are words for a friend that is not a friend and that is Bush.
Yes even with all of this it still has been better then having Gore or Kerry instead , NOT MUCH but God help us if they had won. BUT Bush compared to McCain is on several issues is still more of a conservative then McCain will ever be.
Regarding Romney becoming more conservative. One thing about being in office and saying you have changed from being a left thinker to a conservative. It is very public, and he can never switch back to liberalism. If he did, his political career would be over. A good example is Bush and how he has let us down switching on several things to liberal decisions and actions. He is screwed now because the respect once given him is gone. IF Bush had a second term coming up he would never be voted for again.
Flipping can only endure one exercise in politics, and so Romney is stuck over here on the right with those of us who care about pre-born children and the value that marriage offers to society and knowing what amnesty means and are against it.
Romney is a fiscal genius, and I feel he can be trusted to turn the Executive Branch back in the right direction. He would be the smartest president we’ve had since Ronald Reagan, and he might be the most successful businessman to serve in the Oval Office. Romney is big enough to admit he was on the wrong side in the past and that he is on the right side now. Out of all the remaining candidates, he elicits the most trust and respect. Not that it is abundant but it is there.
Romney is not perfect, and I sure have learned that is not possible for any politician to be perfect. I am writing this with my eyes wide open. Like it is said, 'trust but verify', well I am going to put my trust in him to do the right thing more then I would the others. It is a HUGE thing for me to do this, especially after having Hunter and Thompson pull out when I was so much for them. I will not defend Romney when he is wrong, just as I have never defended Bush when he has been so wrong and that has been often unfortunately.
We know Romney is good with economics and here is what he has said about Israel and the terrorists we both fight. From all the things I have read Mitt is the only candidate who has unabashedly expressed support for Israel, openly condemned enemies of the United States and Israel (like Iran) and does not come up with anti-Semitic, anti-dual citizenship ideas.
Mitt Romney delivered the following remarks on April 26 at Yeshiva University in New York.
"Today, America faces a number of critical challenges. In my view, at the top of the list is the threat of radical, violent Jihad and the associated threat of nuclear proliferation."I think many of us, including some of our leaders, fail to comprehend the extent of this threat. Take former President Jimmy Carter. President Carter thinks that Israel's security fence is the thing that keeps peace from coming to the Holy Land.
"Having just been to Israel, I came to the opposite conclusion: the security fence keeps peace in Israel - it's helping - that fence is helping prevent bloodshed and terror and violence.
"What Jimmy Carter fails to understand is what so many fail to understand. Whether it's Hamas or Hezbollah; Al Qaeda or Shia and Sunni extremists, there is an overarching goal among the violent Jihadists - and it transcends borders and boundaries. That goal is to replace all modern Islamic states with a religious caliphate, to destroy Israel, to cause the collapse of the West and the United States, and to conquer the entire world."
"I think it's important for us to isolate Iran diplomatically. Their leaders should be made to feel exactly like those of Apartheid South Africa, or worse. That's why I ordered the state police of Massachusetts to refuse security details for former Iranian President Khatami when he came to Harvard."
And this from Powerline dated January 28.2007: ....for complete article and speech
Joel Mowbray continues his reports from the three-day conference in Herzliya, Israel that concluded this past Wednesday. Today Joel provides his take on Governor Romney's speech at the conference. Joel titles his report "Romney REALLY gets it."What I had not seen from him before, though, was any real indication that he had more than a passing knowledge of foreign policy or a decent handle on the global struggle in which we are engaged.
After what I witnessed, however, it’s hard not to be a Romney cheerleader.
What was most extraordinary was how clearly Romney articulated the nature of the common enemy Israel and the United States both face. It was, by far, the most remarkable speech on the topic given by an American politician of either party, on television or in person.
One line in particular captures how thoroughly Romney understands our jihadist enemies:
“Contrary to the Baker-Hamilton Commission, resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict will not magically mollify the jihadists.”
Don’t let the clever phrasing hide the serious message. The origins of modern Islamic fundamentalism long precede the creation of the Jewish state of Israel, and Palestinians merely serve as convenient propaganda to rile the masses. And as the world has seen, radical Islamic propaganda can be found just about anywhere: ultimately untrue stories about the flushing of a Qur’an, quoting a medieval scholar, or even cartoons. Romney gets that.
It’s not just that Romney strongly supports Israel—that would hardly distinguish him in American politics—it’s that his support is rooted, at least in part, in a textured comprehension of Islamic fundamentalism. For proof, read the next few paragraphs of Romney’s remarks:
“No, what we should have realized since 9/11 is that what the world regarded as an Israeli-Arab conflict over borders represented something much larger. It was the oldest, most active front of the radical Islamist jihad against the entire West. It therefore was not really about borders. It was about the refusal of many parts of the Muslim world to accept Israel’s right to exist – within any borders.
“This distinction came into vivid focus this summer. The war in Lebanon had little to do with the Palestinians. And it had nothing to do with a two-state solution. It demonstrated that Israel is now facing a jihadist front that from Tehran through Damascus to Southern Lebanon and Gaza.
“As Tony Blair astutely put it, Hizbullah was not fighting ‘for the coming into being of a Palestinian state…but for the going out of being of an Israeli state.’
“Yet we have still not fully absorbed the magnitude of the change. As far as our enemies are concerned, there is just one conflict. And in this single conflict, the goal of destroying Israel is simply a way station toward the real goal of subjugating the entire West.”
On the topic of the most pernicious present threat, Iran, Romney also offered a coherent strategy for nonviolently combating Ahmadinejad and the mullahs. He laid out a 5-point plan that included economic and diplomatic isolation of the regime, prodding Arab states to lock arms with the West, and working with “progressive” Muslims in Iran and elsewhere to “defeat radical Islam.”
You can see the entire speech at the Powerline link.
The thing that I think I understand now that can never be changed is that like Tom, Mark, Rhod, Steve, Darth, Jack, Les, Lynn, John, John 5, Bob, Yankeemom, everyone, gosh all of you have explained is how we are Global now. Reagan was the only President that as far as I know was not a globalist. But both Bush's have been and are, Clinton, Carter etc. I think we are stuck with it and boy howdy do I ever hate it with a passion.
I have been saying a lot how America has changed and it has, but so has the entire world. I wish it was like it used to be. Manufacturers here at home and our own citizens working in them. Borders meaning something and right being right and left being the distance of the Grand Canyon apart in the differences of the two parties. Political correctness not even being a word in our vocabulary would be nice too.
I pray for our country, for our military that it keeps getting funded first and foremost. That people will keep tearing up with our Anthem and seeing our Flag fly freely in the breeze to pay tribute to the lives that gave us our freedom like no other land. And pray for our leaders to have shame when they even try to take us down a road of destruction of our country.
We still live in the best country in the world and it is because of each one of you that has been a part of making this possible. I adore your hearts and passion for wanting things to be right and fighting back the left when we can, it is awesome. You all fought and served this country, and deserve so much better then what has been offered up to vote for.
Thank you for letting me share my thoughts with you. So ii he makes it to the next time I get to vote, I will be voting for Mitt Romney.
(((( hug ))))
Posted by Wild Thing at January 30, 2008 02:47 PM
Comments
This post is from Black Five (Uncle Jimbo)
President McCain or President Obama?
Posted By Uncle Jimbo
This goes out to Michelle Malkin, Hugh Hewitt, Rush Limbaugh and the rest of those who now have the peasants all pitch-forked and torched up ready to take out the Maverick.
Since I am not a Republican or a conservative my advice may not mean all that much to you, but c'est la vie. Heck if Sarkozy can help the French make nice with the US, maybe a libertarian-leaning hawk can roost with true movement conservatives.
I am asking all of you to chill out and quit fanning conservative hate of John McCain. You can feature reader email outraged that the shamnesty King will destroy us all, but you all have spent months stoking those fires and made sure he was damaged goods.
So time to decide what's important to you, ideological purity or making sure we are not subjected to 8 years of President Obama. You can complain all you want about McCain's shortcomings, but how does he shape up against a true movement progressive. Obama's policies would be right at home here in the Mad City and unless Republicans field a candidate who can beat him, we will watch the socialism train travel around the country.
I wish Mitt Romney were a more compelling candidate, he would win any interview for the job of President conducted by a competent executive search committee. But the fact is he comes across as a conservative Ken doll and the only people he inspires are insiders. I agree with him on more policies than I do with McCain, but I also believe Obama would beat him and that matters more. I have to compare the damage a naive tool like Obama could do to our foreign policy, not to mention the progressive destruction of individual rights domestically.
So answer this one simple question before the next time you decide to hammer the Maverick, President McCain or President Obama?
Posted by: Tincan Sailor at January 30, 2008 03:11 PM
Tincan Sailor, I am not sure which part of this is what you are saying or Uncle Jimbo. So I will only be able to reply as though it is all coming from your copy paste of what Uncle Jimbo said.
First I will never stop telling it like it is with McCain as long as I live. Even if he becomes President I will do just as I have done with Bush, I will speak the truth always.When Bush did good I said so, when Bush did things I disagreed with I said so then too.
Tincan you copy paste says Uncle Jimbo says he is not a Republican or a conservative. That tells me a lot. No other comment on that from me is necessary.
To think that only a dem in Republican clothing like McCain can beat another Dem like Obama or even Hillary is giving up. I am a warrior and I will do what I can to keep full blown dems or 'dems lite' like McCain is out of office.
His crimes against our POW's after the Vietnam war are enough for me to be totally disgusted. His Amnesty plan and believe me he will force it on our country is outragous.
Thank you for sharing but I am not interested in voting for McCain when there is still one last option left and that is Mitt Romney.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 30, 2008 03:28 PM
McCain is not that bad of guy from what I can tell. Here are some valid points...
McCain-Feingold Limits in Campange contributions act
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ155.107
In summary-
Prevents special interest groups from spending corporate or labor union money on broadcast ads that mention a candidate just prior to an election. The law also doubles the hard money limits for individuals.
That increase, coupled with the soft money ban, gives the GOP a potential fundraising advantage. The GOP traditionally raises more hard money, with soft money comprising only about a third of the party’s campaign funds. The Democrats raised roughly half of their money from soft money donors during the last election.
Immigration-
Sen. McCain voted in favor of final passage of H.R. 6061, the Secure Fence Act of 2006. H.R. 6061:
Sen. McCain voted in favor of the Sessions amendment to H.R. 5631, the Department of of Defense Appropriations bill for 2007. This was an amendment to appropriate $1.8 billion for the construction of border fencing and vehicle barriers along the southern border.
Voted against amendment to make two million illegal aliens eligible for amnesty in 2006
Sen. McCain voted against the Feinstein Amendment (SA 4087) to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. The Feinstein Amendment would have made an additional two million illegal aliens eligible for amnesty by replacing the bill's "earned legalization" amnesty and Deferred Mandatory Departure provisions with a one-tiered scheme in which all aliens illegally present in the United States on or before January 1, 2006, are granted amnesty and an "orange card" (instead of the normal "green card" that lawful permanent residents are issued) if they are otherwise admissible. The, after a 6-8 year period, orange card holders are allowed to adjust to Lawful Permanent Resident status if they pay a $2,000 fine. The Feinstein Amendment failed by a vote of 37 to 61.
“First and foremost among our priorities was to ensure this bill included strong border security and enforcement provisions. We need to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security has the resources it needs to secure our borders to the greatest extent possible. These include man power, vehicles, and detention facilities for those apprehended. But we also need to take a 21st century approach to this 21st century problem. We need to create virtual barriers as well, through the use of Unmanned Aerial Systems, ground censors, cameras, vehicle barriers, advanced communications systems and the most up to date security technologies available to us.
First, consider the 10 to 12 million illegal immigrants who are already here. They now have an incentive to think only in the short term. They have little reason to invest for the future because their presence here could be taken away.
This bill would encourage them to think in the long term. To stay, they would have to embark on a long, 13-year process. They’d have to obey the law, learn English and save money (to pay the stiff fines).
The Senate bill reduces that incentive for lawlessness. If you think it is light on enforcement, read the thing. It would not only beef up enforcement on the border, but would also create an electronic worker registry. People who overstay their welcome could forfeit their chance of being regularized forever.
Posted by: patrickdaniel at January 30, 2008 03:29 PM
Excellent post WT. And, I agree with all you state in that post. I will support Romney. It is not sure yet who the Dem candidate will be. The above letter is jumping the gun. The final two could be Hillary and Romney. If it is Crazy John and Soros Boy, then I will vote for Crazy John.
I do not want to support McCain, but if he is the Repub candidate, I will vote for him over the Dem. The past three presidents should have conditioned us conservatives to disappointment. Perhaps a President Romney would surprise us in a pleasant way. I will maintain some optimism, and at the same time buy more ammo and guns.
Does anyone here know anything about Romney's thinking on globalism?
Posted by: TomR at January 30, 2008 03:29 PM
So we are to shut up and vote for McCain. I don't think so.
Patric also failed to mentioned the 'Keating 5' a nice little scandal that cost private business Millions of dollars.
Of course, I might lie constantly too, if I were seeking the Republican presidential nomination after enthusiastically promoting amnesty for illegal aliens, Social Security credit for illegal aliens, criminal trials for terrorists, stem-cell research on human embryos, crackpot global warming legislation and free speech-crushing campaign-finance laws.
Yeah, Patrick this guy is a real conservative.
As Rhod says, I too may violate the good citizenship rule and not vote at all. Because I am F'n tired of hearing about the party, well if this is the party and if Juan McCain is the best we can do then Screw the party. And say hello to MexAmeriCanada.
***And now I just read that Illegal Immigrants may get rebates as part of the Stimulus package.***
I can not and will not vote for Juan McCain. Yes, he is a veteran and so am I of the same War and as Chrissie points out he also stabbed my lost brothers in the back and that puts him on the level of 'Hanoi' John Kerry.
MexCain, also said that the 'Swift-boat Veterans for truth' were running commercials that were dishonorable. But not Mexcain nor kerry can disprove anything, not even one charge.
If you think this is bad talk about MexCain, wait til this turd gets the Republican Nomination, the press will turn on this POS, and rip him a new one in order to push their choice, whoever that dem may be.
Posted by: Mark at January 30, 2008 04:07 PM
This is what I'm talking about,From the WSJ today
PLAINS, Ga. -- Former President Jimmy Carter lavished praise on Illinois Sen. Barack Obama during an interview at his home on Monday, though he won't formally endorse any candidate in the race for the Democratic nomination.
I live in the next biggest state for Mormons and
Obama is going to be here Sat,the only problem
they have is finding a place big enough for the crowd.We are a RED State but you would never no it
as there a ton of Republicans Jumping ship.Not me
even if I have to vote for McCain.Obama has been
said to be on the left of Hillary and that is a bad thing,a very,very Bad thing!!! I was 21 when
JFK ran for office and what you seen now is becomining the same as it was then and it's the
18-25 year old's that are the driving force...
Posted by: Tincan Sailor at January 30, 2008 06:32 PM
Tincan Sailor, I will respond later. I have to go watch the debate and fix dinner right now.
*** Just one thing, when you type your email to make your commment, you are adding extra letters after the com on the end of your email address and that is why it is not going through automatically. Because you are on my ok list for comments so I just wanted you to know why it is not going through right away.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 30, 2008 06:40 PM
WOW! Chrissie, that was great. I would love to see you as the featured guest in a triple header next Sunday morning with Chris Wallace, George Stephanopoulis, and Tim Russert. Yes, I know it is Super Bowl Sunday, but you would give all three of them a run for their money leading in to the Super Tuesday primaries. Your well thought out analysis and conclusions are a bullseye hit on the election.
Now, let me say that no matter how many Democrats, liberals, mainstream media, talking heads, and desperate and confused Republicans try and promote John McCain for whatever reason, HE WILL NEVER BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. That is a fact, so get over it.
I will not vote for him and neither will enough others to get him elected. John McCain is, at best, a RINO. He would have to deal with a Democratic controlled Congress who with his help prevented George Bush from getting his conservative nominees approved by the Senate. John McCain would not stand up to the Democrats in Congress and would cave in to them every step of the way. He joined them against Bush too many times so why wouldn't he join with them as President?
If the country is stupid enough to elect a President Hillary Clinton (and Co-President/Racist Bill Clinton) or a President Barack Obama it deserves everything that happens to it. If anyone thinks that the pain will be isolated to only Republicans they are greatly mistaken. Democrats will suffer equally and will justifiably be blamed for what they have done.
I won't fall for the lesser of two evils crap and, I repeat, JOHN MCCAIN WILL NEVER BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
I will cast my vote for Mitt Romney next Tuesday in the corrupt and functionally bankrupt Blue state of New Jersey. Hopefully, enough Republicans will vote for Mitt Romney as our last chance to save the party and avoid becoming the newest and quick to fail Socialist nanny-state country.
Posted by: Les at January 30, 2008 07:44 PM
Excellent post Chrissie, you have covered all the bases quite well.Thank you.
Posted by: Jack at January 30, 2008 11:24 PM
I cleaned up the mess on the e-mail address. So
you can see where Uncle Jimbo is coming from
here is a link to In the cross hairs from
Blackfive tv.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrHIru-TxbQ&eurl=http://www.blackfive.net/
Posted by: Tincan Sailor at January 30, 2008 11:45 PM
"The French are governed by prostitutes" sayeth Mark Twain...Our TRUE PATRIOTIC AMERICANS: Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson have been thrown to the dogs by their own GOPher party...Now we're down to the following WWF steel cage tag-team match between M & M's Mitt & Mac versus HIPS 'N Q-TIPS? So sickening and Ron Paul will be the gue$t referee?
Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at January 31, 2008 12:08 AM
Patrick, thank you.
I owe my allegiance to all my Nam POW's that were never given a chance to come home, and McCain is to blame for it.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:24 AM
Tom, thank you. It is so hard and scary too.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:30 AM
Mark, thank you.
It took to two days to write this post. I wanted to make sure I made sense. Not othat this election makes any sense.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:35 AM
Tincan Sailor, oh good I am glad your email addy is ok now.
That is awful that so many want to vote for Obama like you said. He is so far to the left it will be horrible to have him for President.
Thanks for the link and information. Yes in many ways it is the 60's all over again and it is brought to us from the left every bit of it.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:48 AM
Les, thank you, it took me awhile to write it. I was so afraid I wouldn't make sense.
I agree, it amazes me how what the left wants will hurt their own as well as all of us. They want socialism but once the people get it they are not going to like it one little bit.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:51 AM
Jack thank you. I watched McCain tonight in the debate and could feel my blood boiling.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:53 AM
Darth, oh wow that sure is, and what a scene that is too.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 31, 2008 12:54 AM
