« Fred Body Slams Huckster! Bada BOOM bada bing! | Main | Daily KOS Pathetic Excuse For Human Beings »
January 11, 2008
Bush: Israel must cease 'occupation' of Arab land
Bush: Israel must cease 'occupation' of Arab land
RAMALLAH, West Bank
By ANNE GEARAN
Associated Press
President Bush, summing up meetings with both sides in the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, said today that a peace accord will require "painful political concessions" by each. Resolving the status of Jerusalem will be hard, he said, and he called for the end of the "occupation" of Arab land by the Israeli military.
"Now is the time to make difficult choices," Bush said after a first-ever visit to the Palestinian territories, which followed separate meetings with Israeli leaders in Jerusalem the day before.
Bush is in the Mideast for eight days, trying to bolster his goal of achieving a long-elusive peace agreement by the end of his presidency in a year. Speaking at his hotel in Jerusalem, he said again that he thinks that is possible.
"I am committed to doing all I can to achieve it," Bush said. Within minutes, Bush's national security adviser Stephen Hadley said the president would return to the Middle East "at least once and maybe more" over the next year. He wouldn't elaborate on possible destinations, but another White House official said Bush is likely to attend Israel's 60th anniversary celebrations in May.
Bush gave his most detailed summation yet of what a final peace should include, including U.S. expectations for the resolution of some of the hardest issues in the violent conflict, one of the world's longest-running and most intractable. He used tough language intended to put both sides on notice that he sees no reason they cannot get down to serious business, "starting right now."
In his set of U.S. bottom lines were security for Israel, a "contiguous" state for the Palestinians and the expectation that final borders will be negotiated to accommodate territorial changes since Israel's formation. He also suggested international compensation for Palestinians and their descendants who claim a right to return to land they held before Israel's formation.
He made a point of using a loaded term — occupation — to describe Israeli control over land that would eventually form the bulk of an independent Palestinian state. That he did so in Jerusalem underscored that he is trying not to seem partial to Israel.
On borders, Bush said any peace agreement "will require mutually agreed adjustments" to the lines drawn for Israel in the late 1940s. He was referring primarily to Israeli neighborhoods on disputed lands that Israel would keep when an independent Palestinian state is formed.
Earlier in the day, Bush had said Palestinians deserve better than a "Swiss cheese" state fitted around Israeli land and security bulwarks.
"The point of departure for permanent status negotiations to realize this vision seems clear," he said. "There should be an end to the occupation that began in 1967. The agreement must establish a Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people just as Israel is a homeland for the Jewish people."
White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said Bush was referring to the West Bank when he spoke of occupation.
Bush offered no specifics to resolve the fate of disputed Jerusalem, but urged both sides to work toward a solution in what he said could be the most difficult issue to settle in a long list of them.
"I know Jerusalem is a tough issue," Bush said. "Both sides have deeply felt political and religious concerns."
"It is vital that each side understands that satisfying the other's fundamental objectives is key to a successful agreement," the president said. "Security for Israel and viability for the Palestinian state are in the mutual interests of both parties."
Hadley said that Bush wasn't announcing new U.S. policy with any of his statements, but was trying to reiterate the American position all in one place. "The important thing ... is what he's beginning to hear from the Palestinian and the Israeli side," he said.
Bush spent most of his day in the Palestinian West Bank, seeking to counter Palestinians' skepticism about his commitment to Mideast peace.
He undercut that message somewhat by saying it may not be possible to resolve this year the current, violent split in Palestinian leadership — vital to a deal establishing an independent state. The militant group Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in June, meaning the Palestinian people — and the land that could eventually form an independent Palestine — are split between governance by Hamas there and by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah-led government in the West Bank. The president is not stopping in Gaza.
Bush had harsh criticism for Hamas, which does not recognize Israel's right to exist. Hamas, he said, was elected to help improve the lot of Palestinians, but "has delivered nothing but misery."
"The question is whether or not hard issues can be resolved and the vision emerges, so that the choice is clear amongst the Palestinians," Bush said at Abbas' side at his government's headquarters in Ramallah. "The choice being, 'Do you want this state? Or do you want the status quo? Do you want a future based upon a democratic state? Or do you want the same old stuff?"'
"We want a state, of course," Abbas said in English.
Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri called Bush's comments a "declaration of war."
"Bush's visit and remarks today have indicated that his visit came to support the occupation and has brought nothing to the Palestinian people but evil," the Hamas spokesman said.
Bush's West Bank visit has generated little excitement among Palestinians, who doubt his promises to try to move along Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. Bush has kept Mideast peace at arm's length until now, and the U.S. is perceived in the Palestinian areas in any case as a staunch ally of Israel, at the expense of the Palestinians.
Abbas, however, said Bush's visit "gives our people great hope."
The Palestinian leader called on Israel to fulfill its commitments under a 2003 U.S.-backed Mideast peace plan. The plan, known as the roadmap, calls on Israel to halt settlement activity in the West Bank, while requiring the Palestinians to dismantle militant groups. Neither side has fully carried out its obligations.
Bush has named Lt. Gen. William Fraser III, assistant to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to monitor steps that both sides are making on the peace process, a U.S. official told The Associated Press. That, too, met with approval by Palestinian officials. "It's one of the positive signs of the visit," said Mohammed Mustafa, economic adviser to Abbas.
With his presidency over a year from now, Bush said he knows "I've got 12 months."
And from CNN that also has the write up about this, as a backup of this story.
Bush calls for 'painful' Mideast concessions
CNN ....for complete article
JERUSALEM (CNN) -- President Bush called on Israeli and Palestinian leaders Thursday to make "painful" concessions to reach a peace agreement, including dismantling "terrorist infrastructure" and ending Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories.
"There should be an end to the occupation that began in 1967," Bush told reporters in Jerusalem. "The agreement must establish a Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people, just as Israel is a homeland for the Jewish people."
Bush also called on Palestinians to confront terrorists and dismantle "terrorist infrastructure." "Security is fundamental," Bush said. "No agreement and no Palestinian state will be born of terror." Bush also appealed for "Arab countries to reach out to Israel."
Wild Thing's comment........
This is one of those things where a person keeps blinking because they can't believe what they are reading. Bush is doing the devils work and with a broad smile on his face.
"I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you." (Genesis 12:2-3)
And the Lord said to Jacob... "Unto thy offspring will I give this land."
The Palestinians want to wipe Israel, the Jews, totally off the face of the earth, and God's not going to let that happen,. His word declares that.
If we choose a path that helps undermine Israel's national security, we're going to be working to do something that's opposed to the will of God.
Posted by Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 03:55 AM
Comments
What road map? GOD gave His chosen people their land - period. This is one pathetic Lamo Duck! Notice how VP Cheney hasn't said a word... very eerie. This is the thanks Israel gets for taking out that Iraqi nuke power plant in 1983?
Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at January 11, 2008 05:56 AM
This is very sad.
We did this to the Indians, to whom this land was given by the Great Creator and was promised to them as long as the sun still shone and grass was still green and we took it from them by force.
Now we're expecting the Israelites to move again? Excuse Me? No. The Israelites and the Palestinians are just going to have to learn to live with each other. If we can do it in America, they can do it there, too.
We have no business dictating terms over there. We are only on the hook to defend Israel if a war breaks out. That's it.
Bush pulled a big NO-NO here!
Posted by: Lynn at January 11, 2008 08:14 AM
Boy, them Israelis are sure occupying a whole lot of Arab land. Maybe Bush would rather the Israelis drowned in the Mediterranean?
Posted by: BobF at January 11, 2008 09:30 AM
Reminds me of another lame duck president, Bush41. His effort to establish a legacy got us into Somalia where we did not need to be. Then he very publically renounced his life membership in the NRA. That organization and it's members supported Bush41 throughout his political career and responded to his requests for that support. Now Bush41 is buddy-buddy with the man that defeated him.
Bush43 seems to be making buddy-buddy with the wrong people also, in this case Palestinians. In pursuit of a legacy? Do you wonder who will be paying that "compensation" to Palestinians? Jorge has also stiffed his supporters by giving away US sovereignty.
I don't see how Israel will ever be able to be at peace with the islamic world. America supporting her mortal enemy is no help.
Posted by: TomR at January 11, 2008 10:30 AM
I remember reading somewhere that Israel owns about 1 % of Arab land, it looks less than that. And since the Palestinians are Arabs itsn't it Saudi Arabia's responsibilty to give them a homeland ? If that is really what they want. But we all know the PLO's track record, there sole goal is the complete destruction of Israel.
Obviously, Bush is trying to write his legacy but for all his efforts of backstabbing Israel, he will be lumped into the Carter-Clinton group who willingly aided the Palestinians and to help further their goal of getting rid of the Israeli's.
We of course should not be surprised, Bush is selling his own country to Mexico along with our sovereignty all for his legacy, which is the Elitist world view of a global government.
The first thing the Israeli's have to do is get rid of Ohlmert and the sooner we are rid of Bush the better off both countries will be.
Posted by: Mark at January 11, 2008 10:33 AM
I have to give Bush credit. He picked up and used all of the Palestinian core non-negotiable demand keywords; "Occupation", "Jerusalem", "right of return", and now "contiguous state". Hopefully, this will back his willing lapdog, Ehud Olmert, into a corner and his far left wing government will fall as some of the smaller parties reject this suicide plan and leave his coalition.
This is a great opportunity for the presidential candidates of either party to nail Bush on his hypocritical war on terror as he sells out the only real ally that we have in the Middle East to the terrorist enemy.
Posted by: Les at January 11, 2008 05:24 PM
Darth, good point I agree. The only thing I do know is that Cheney butted heads with Bush and Condi about Iran. He wanted to come down stronger on them in the warnings etc.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 11:37 PM
Lynn, yes we are not very good friends to Israel. And the way Bush is talking it seems we are pushing them away from us.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 11:38 PM
Bob yes isn't it something so much land and that tiny country that the terrorists demand they own too. sheesh
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 11:40 PM
Tom, we are learning that sovereignty is not something Bush cares about for Israel or for America.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 11:41 PM
Mark, your right, oh how I wish we would be strong for our own sovereignty and be a true and loyal friend to Israel.
More and more it is like a bond between the Clinton's, Carter and Bush family, I guess it is the families of globalists and there is nothing good in that at all.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 11:45 PM
Les I agree, I would love to hear what those running for President have to say about all of this. So far no questions about it even in the debates.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 11, 2008 11:46 PM
PS: Do ya think the MOSSAD or Apaches or Sioux would have hunted down Osama bin Laden within ...
SIX YEARS? The Apaches wouldn't use waterboarding... they'd slit your eye lids and cover you with honey and bury you up to your neck... and let the ants and scorpions have their way, eh? Turban placement? Optional!
... And How 2008
Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at January 11, 2008 11:54 PM
Darth, "Turban placement? Optional!
"....LOL
And I am a fan of the Mossad and I think so too that they would not mess around with PC stuff. But then neither would our troops if they hadn't had to.
Posted by: Wild Thing at January 12, 2008 12:25 AM
