Theodore's World: Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki: Country can manage without U.S.

« PPE Stops Round, Saves Marine | Main | An Oldie From The Carson Show »

July 15, 2007

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki: Country can manage without U.S.



Iraq PM: Country can manage without U.S.

BAGHDAD

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Saturday that the Iraqi army and police are capable of keeping security in the country when American troops leave "any time they want," though he acknowledged the forces need further weapons and training.

The embattled prime minister sought to show confidence at a time when congressional pressure is growing for a withdrawal and the Bush administration reported little progress had been made on the most vital of a series of political benchmarks it wants al-Maliki to carry out.

Al-Maliki said difficulty in enacting the measures was "natural" given Iraq's turmoil.

But one of his top aides, Hassan al-Suneid, rankled at the assessment, saying the U.S. was treating Iraq like "an experiment in an American laboratory." He sharply criticised the U.S. military, saying it was committing human rights violations, embarassing the Iraqi government with its tactics and cooperating with "gangs of killers" in its campaign against al-Qaida in Iraq.

Al-Suneid's comments were a rare show of frustration toward the Americans from within al-Maliki's inner circle as the prime minister struggles to overcome deep divisions between Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish members of his coalition and enact the American-drawn list of benchmarks.

In new violence in Baghdad on Saturday, a car bomb leveled a two-story apartment building, and a suicide bomber plowed his explosives-packed vehicle into a line of cars at a gas station. The two attacks killed at least eight people, police officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorize to release details of the attacks.

Thursday's White House assessment of progress on the benchmarks fueled calls among congressional critics of the Iraqi policy for a change in strategy, including a withdrawal of American forces.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari warned earlier this week of civil war and the government's collapse if the Americans leave. But al-Maliki told reporters Saturday, "We say in full confidence that we are able, God willing, to take the responsibility completely in running the security file if the international forces withdraw at any time they want."
But he added that Iraqi forces are "still in need of more weapons and rehabilitation" to be ready in the case of a withdrawal.
On Friday, the Pentagon conceded that the Iraqi army has become more reliant on the U.S. military. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Peter Pace, said the number of Iraqi batallions able to operate on their own without U.S. support has dropped in recent months from 10 to six, though he said the fall was in part due to attrition from stepped-up offensives.
Al-Maliki told a Baghdad press conference that his government needs "time and effort" to enact the political reforms that Washington seeks - "particularly since the political process is facing security, economic and services pressures, as well as regional and international interference."
"These difficulties can be read as a big success, not negative points, when they are viewed under the shadow of the big challenges," he said.

In the White House strategy, beefed-up American forces have been waging intensified security crackdowns in Baghdad and areas to the north and south for nearly a month. The goal is to bring quiet to the capital while al-Maliki gives Sunni Arabs a greater role in the goverment and political process, lessening support for the insurgency.

But the benchmarks have been blocked by divisions among Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish leaders. In August, the parliament is taking a one month vacation - a shorter break than the usual two months, but still enough to anger some in Congress who say lawmakers should push through the measures.

Al-Suneid, a Shiite lawmaker close to al-Maliki, bristled at the pressure. He called Thursday's report "objective," but added, "this bothers us a lot that the situation looks as if it is an experiment in an American laboratory (judging) whether we succeed or fail."
He also told The Associated Press that al-Maliki has problems with the top U.S. commander Gen. David Petraeus, who works along a "purely American vision."

He criticized U.S. overtures to Sunni groups in Anbar and Diyala, encouraging former insurgents to join the fight against al-Qaida in Iraq. "These are gangs of killers," he said.

"There are disagreements that the strategy that Petraeus is following might succeed in confronting al-Qaida in the early period but it will leave Iraq an armed nation, an armed society and militias," said al-Suneid.

He said that the U.S. authorities have embarrassed al-Maliki' government through acts such as constructing a wall around Baghdad's Sunni neighborhood of Azamiyah and repeated raids on suspected Shiite militiamen in the capital's eastern slum of Sadr City. He said the U.S. use of airstrikes to hit suspected insurgent positions also kills civilians.

"This embarrasses the government in front of its people," he said, calling the civilian deaths a "human rights violation."

Wild Thing's comment............

Earth to Maliki, earth to Maliki, you would get pummeled by Al-Qaeda in a NY minute.

The Parliament had a vote of no confidence on Maliki scheduled for today. I heard this last week and haven't heard any more about it since, so I don't know if it's still on.

He said that the U.S. authorities have embarrassed al-Maliki' government through acts such as constructing a wall around Baghdad's Sunni neighborhood of Azamiyah and repeated raids on suspected Shiite militiamen in the capital's eastern slum of Sadr City. He said the U.S. use of airstrikes to hit suspected insurgent positions also kills civilians.

He doesn't care about the civilians. He cares about his Iran-backed Mahdi Army buddies. He has a hissy-fit every time our troops (justifiably) go into that cesspool called Sadr City and cleans out some of the trash.

They're all reacting, to our Congress, and to Bush I think. There is a lot of dissatisfaction with Maliki in the Parliament and among the Iraqi people, Shia and Sunni alike.

Nouri al-Maliki is reacting to several things I think. To our Congress and their vote, to Bush and the list of what Nouri al-Maliki was supposed to have accompolished by now not being completely done. Back in Dec. of 2006 the Iraq's were discussing replacing Nouri al-Maliki and he mouthed off then too. But imo, Nouri al-Maliki better be careful with his words. He is supposed to be a leader and not be a reactor, but a person that thinks things through and looks down the road for his country to win against the insurgents.

Posted by Wild Thing at July 15, 2007 12:55 AM


Comments

Chrissie, then WHY in GOD'S name aren't Maliki's Wacki Iraqis 'walking' through the streets of Babylon detecting IED's instead of our ground troops? I am 100% sick to my stomach to watch our troops come back to our supposed super power nation without fingers, eyes, hands, arms and legs... and taking HITS for these assbackward turd world camel jockeys. Obviously our #43 administartion and Pentagonners haven't a conscience or a clue about WINNING a war!
- Former Gulf War & Somalia USAF DAV

Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at July 15, 2007 01:51 AM


Dude, you are so right, I felt alone in this world until I saw your site. I am so glade that a soldier can come home and see someone like yourself who is speaking there mind in the support of troops like me. I served OIF 4, and I support this site 110%. Seriously, so far you seem to be the only person who really (gets) what is going on in the world...thank you.

Posted by: burzum at July 15, 2007 04:18 AM


No they can't! Not yet anyway.
Problem is they'd rather get taken over by Iran.
Maliki seems like a neurotic kid with stage fright.
He's like Jeff Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgmont High-"I can fix it." when he can't do jack.
It would be a complete and utter disaster if we left right now--not only for the Iraqis, but us as well.
And the liberal media would swing it another way how America is just a Paper Tiger and we ducked out the back door when it got too hard. Mark my words--that's exactly what they would do. That Bush didn't have the "stomach" for it after all and what a BIG failure he is.

Posted by: Lynn at July 15, 2007 06:52 AM


This war is complicated, due to error-prone leadership from our Administration, anti-war efforts of the American Left and the inherent ineptness and corruptness of the Middle East.

Like in Vietnam, the enemy has sanctuaries. This time Syria and Iran. We need to be conducting anti stabilization operations in these two countries, but, well, you know, World opinion. We should have encouraged Israel in it's war with Hezbollah, but instead we pushed for the old negotiation table. A strong anti-Syrian Lebanon would really have caused Syria some problems.

Now, if the Turks move into Iraq to chastise the Kurds, we really have a dilemma.

I kinda wonder if we had just put some cruise missles into a bunch of Saudi palaces on 12 Sep 01 if a lot more would have been accomplished.

Posted by: TomR at July 15, 2007 02:27 PM


TomR, they've got sanctuaries right on the battlefield...Mosques. They can shoot at us from within a Mosque and their isn't a thing we can do about it.

Funny though, when the Allies thought the Germans were using a Catholic Monastery in Italy during WWII, the Allies bombed the crap out of it.

Posted by: BobF at July 15, 2007 09:30 PM


Darth, Nick says the same thing. Why not have their Army do the walking through the streets instead of our guys.

Posted by: Wild Thing at July 16, 2007 12:07 AM


burzum, thank you so much. And thank you for serving our country.

Posted by: Wild Thing at July 16, 2007 12:08 AM


Lynn your right, it would be one of the worst nightmares if we left.

Posted by: Wild Thing at July 16, 2007 12:10 AM


Tom, thanks it sure is complicated. And then we add in all the PC into this war and whew oh man just so many things to mess this up and make it harder then it already is for our troops

Posted by: Wild Thing at July 16, 2007 12:17 AM


Brother Burzum...I was in TAC, USAFE and MAC (1976-1997)and flew in war & peace. I have never felt as embarrassed as I am now prior to 1979 when the Iraniacs took 62 Americans hostage in Tehran... and Prez Carter let them ROT in captivity for 444 days. Only Ronnie Reagan freed them on January 20, 1981 ! God bless you...

Posted by: darthcrUSAderworldtour07 at July 16, 2007 03:40 AM